Ad is loading...
FBGTX vs LIKPX
FBGTX vs LIKPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. LIKPX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and LIKPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. LIKPX (12.6B). LIKPX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: LIKPX (2.19) vs FBGTX (1.53). FBGTX was incepted earlier than LIKPX: FBGTX (11 years) vs LIKPX (7 years). FBGTX (0.44) and LIKPX (0.44) have similar cost to investors . LIKPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 7.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIKPX: FBGTX (250) vs LIKPX (1000). LIKPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. FBGTX (7.27). LIKPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.05 vs. FBGTX (46.50).
| FBGTX | LIKPX | FBGTX / LIKPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.39 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.44 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.833 | -0.883 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 12.6B | 344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 2.19 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 9.21 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.40 | 22.24 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.50 | 65.05 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...