Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs LIKPX
FBGTX vs LIKPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. LIKPX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and LIKPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.8B vs. LIKPX (13.6B). LIKPX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: LIKPX (2.10) vs FBGTX (1.44). FBGTX was incepted earlier than LIKPX: FBGTX (11 years) vs LIKPX (7 years). FBGTX (0.44) and LIKPX (0.43) have similar cost to investors . LIKPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than LIKPX: FBGTX (250) vs LIKPX (1000). FBGTX (12.88) and LIKPX (12.42) have marching annual gain over last year. LIKPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.86 vs. FBGTX (49.89).
| FBGTX | LIKPX | FBGTX / LIKPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.39 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.43 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.750 | 7.753 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.8B | 13.6B | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.10 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.88 | 12.42 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.97 | 42.73 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.89 | 65.86 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers