Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs MLFIX
FBGTX vs MLFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. MLFIX commentary
Jun 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and MLFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 46B vs. MLFIX (790M). MLFIX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: MLFIX (2.73) vs FBGTX (1.44). FBGTX was incepted earlier than MLFIX: FBGTX (11 years) vs MLFIX (20 years). MLFIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). MLFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). MLFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: MLFIX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.12 vs. MLFIX (7.81). MLFIX (46.91) and FBGTX (44.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | MLFIX | FBGTX / MLFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.56 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.76 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.194 | 4.531 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46B | 790M | 5,823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.73 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.12 | 7.81 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.39 | 18.07 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.78 | 46.91 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.74 | 63.97 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers