Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs MLFIX
FBGTX vs MLFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. MLFIX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and MLFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.8B vs. MLFIX (806M). MLFIX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: MLFIX (2.73) vs FBGTX (1.44). FBGTX was incepted earlier than MLFIX: FBGTX (11 years) vs MLFIX (20 years). MLFIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). MLFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). MLFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBGTX: MLFIX (0) vs FBGTX (250). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.88 vs. MLFIX (10.11). MLFIX (51.47) and FBGTX (49.89) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | MLFIX | FBGTX / MLFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.56 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.76 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.750 | 7.981 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.8B | 806M | 5,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.73 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.88 | 10.11 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.97 | 30.75 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.89 | 51.47 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.30 | 72.12 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement