Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs NSFHX
FBGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.9B vs. NSFHX (11.3M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: NSFHX (1.58) vs FBGTX (1.38). FBGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FBGTX (11 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: FBGTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. NSFHX (3.15). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.01 vs. NSFHX (21.75).
| FBGTX | NSFHX | FBGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.48 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.20 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.681 | 4.974 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.9B | 11.3M | 423,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.58 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 3.15 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.74 | 33.31 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.01 | 21.75 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement