Ad is loading...
FBGTX vs NSFHX
FBGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 44.2B vs. NSFHX (25.9M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: NSFHX (1.71) vs FBGTX (1.51). FBGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FBGTX (11 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: FBGTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. NSFHX (1.52). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.11 vs. NSFHX (26.57).
| FBGTX | NSFHX | FBGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.54 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.50 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.421 | -1.854 | -77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 25.9M | 170,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.71 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.30 | 1.52 | 480% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.71 | 22.18 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.11 | 26.57 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...