Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs NSFHX
FBGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. NSFHX (23.6M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than FBGTX: NSFHX (1.64) vs FBGTX (1.44). FBGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FBGTX (11 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: FBGTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. NSFHX (4.04). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 40.64 vs. NSFHX (19.08).
| FBGTX | NSFHX | FBGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.54 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.50 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.467 | 1.930 | 335% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 23.6M | 196,610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.64 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.55 | 4.04 | 261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.18 | 20.93 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.64 | 19.08 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers