Ad is loading...
FBGTX vs NSFHX
FBGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.5B vs. NSFHX (28.3M). FBGTX pays higher dividends than NSFHX: FBGTX (1.57) vs NSFHX (1.27). FBGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FBGTX (11 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FBGTX (1.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: FBGTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. NSFHX (6.74). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 33.40 vs. NSFHX (15.88).
| FBGTX | NSFHX | FBGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.430 | 3.122 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.5B | 28.3M | 164,311% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.27 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.59 | 6.74 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.25 | 11.98 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.40 | 15.88 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers