Ad is loading...
FBGTX vs NSFHX
FBGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 45.9B vs. NSFHX (27.8M). FBGTX pays higher dividends than NSFHX: FBGTX (1.57) vs NSFHX (1.27). FBGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FBGTX (11 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FBGTX (1.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFHX: FBGTX (250) vs NSFHX (1000000). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.47 vs. NSFHX (10.29). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 31.27 vs. NSFHX (13.24).
| FBGTX | NSFHX | FBGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.960 | 1.561 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.9B | 27.8M | 165,108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.27 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.47 | 10.29 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.02 | 4.62 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.27 | 13.24 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers