Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs PARDX
FBGTX vs PARDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. PARDX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and PARDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. PARDX (24.9B). FBGTX pays higher dividends than PARDX: FBGTX (1.44) vs PARDX (1.29). FBGTX was incepted earlier than PARDX: FBGTX (11 years) vs PARDX (22 years). PARDX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). PARDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.70 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PARDX: FBGTX (250) vs PARDX (2500). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.45 vs. PARDX (7.76). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.30 vs. PARDX (29.45).
| FBGTX | PARDX | FBGTX / PARDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.85 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.85 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.467 | 4.642 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 24.9B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.29 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.45 | 7.76 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.06 | 23.67 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.30 | 29.45 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.12 | 37.10 | 184% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement