Ad is loading...
FBGTX vs PARDX
FBGTX vs PARDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. PARDX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and PARDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX has more cash in the bank: 43.6B vs. PARDX (23.9B). FBGTX pays higher dividends than PARDX: FBGTX (1.53) vs PARDX (1.34). FBGTX was incepted earlier than PARDX: FBGTX (11 years) vs PARDX (22 years). PARDX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). PARDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.70 vs. FBGTX (6.00). FBGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PARDX: FBGTX (250) vs PARDX (2500). FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. PARDX (5.87). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.43 vs. PARDX (29.57).
| FBGTX | PARDX | FBGTX / PARDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.85 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.85 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.588 | -0.729 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 23.9B | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.34 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | 5.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.28 | 11.59 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.43 | 29.57 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.09 | 30.07 | 190% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...