Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs RBKTX
FBGTX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. RBKTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX (45.4B) and RBKTX (45.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBGTX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FBGTX (1.51) vs RBKTX (0.58). FBGTX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FBGTX (11 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). FBGTX (6.00) and RBKTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBGTX (250) and RBKTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. RBKTX (6.87). FBGTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.27 vs. RBKTX (41.68).
| FBGTX | RBKTX | FBGTX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.45 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.45 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.969 | 3.528 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 45.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.58 | 260% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 6.87 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.56 | 23.63 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.27 | 41.68 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 55.53 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement