Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBGTX vs RDGTX
FBGTX vs RDGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. RDGTX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and RDGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX (45.4B) and RDGTX (45.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBGTX pays higher dividends than RDGTX: FBGTX (1.51) vs RDGTX (1.25). FBGTX was incepted earlier than RDGTX: FBGTX (11 years) vs RDGTX (18 years). RDGTX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FBGTX (0.44). FBGTX (6.00) and RDGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBGTX (250) and RDGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBGTX (8.06) and RDGTX (7.80) have marching annual gain over last year. FBGTX (47.27) and RDGTX (46.00) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | RDGTX | FBGTX / RDGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.70 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.70 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.969 | 3.876 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 45.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.25 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 7.80 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.56 | 25.89 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.27 | 46.00 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 61.11 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers