Ad is loading...
FBGTX vs REGTX
FBGTX vs REGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBGTX vs. REGTX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBGTX is a Hold and REGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBGTX (42.7B) and REGTX (42.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . REGTX (1.54) and FBGTX (1.53) have matching dividends . FBGTX was incepted earlier than REGTX: FBGTX (11 years) vs REGTX (18 years). FBGTX (0.44) is less costly to investors than REGTX (0.41). FBGTX (6.00) and REGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBGTX (250) and REGTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. REGTX (6.41) and FBGTX (6.29) have marching annual gain over last year. REGTX (46.23) and FBGTX (45.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBGTX | REGTX | FBGTX / REGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.41 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.41 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.323 | -1.259 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.7B | 42.7B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.54 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.29 | 6.41 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.13 | 14.32 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.78 | 46.23 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.01 | 56.08 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...