Ad is loading...
FBJTX vs TRRNX
FBJTX vs TRRNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBJTX vs. TRRNX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBJTX is a Hold and TRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBJTX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. TRRNX (10.2B). TRRNX pays higher dividends than FBJTX: TRRNX (1.29) vs FBJTX (1.17). FBJTX was incepted earlier than TRRNX: FBJTX (11 years) vs TRRNX (18 years). TRRNX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FBJTX (0.48). TRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.60 vs. FBJTX (5.00). FBJTX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRRNX: FBJTX (250) vs TRRNX (2500). TRRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. FBJTX (6.05). FBJTX (44.91) and TRRNX (44.76) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FBJTX | TRRNX | FBJTX / TRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.64 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.64 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.072 | -1.006 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 10.2B | 237% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.29 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 6.38 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.14 | 18.15 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.91 | 44.76 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.01 | 53.44 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...