Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBKTX vs RCNTX
FBKTX vs RCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBKTX vs. RCNTX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBKTX is a Hold and RCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBKTX (16.4B) and RCNTX (16.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FBKTX pays higher dividends than RCNTX: FBKTX (1.04) vs RCNTX (0.55). FBKTX was incepted earlier than RCNTX: FBKTX (10 years) vs RCNTX (10 years). RCNTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FBKTX (0.48). FBKTX (5.00) and RCNTX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. FBKTX (250) and RCNTX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. RCNTX (9.43). FBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. RCNTX (47.90).
| FBKTX | RCNTX | FBKTX / RCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.03 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.03 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.711 | 6.470 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.4B | 16.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.55 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.07 | 9.43 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.62 | 39.85 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.92 | 47.90 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.16 | 87.30 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers