Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBLAX vs RLBAX
FBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBLAX vs RLBAX
FBLAX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBLAX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBLAX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBLAX (3.45B). FBLAX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBLAX (4.27) vs RLBAX (1.14). FBLAX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBLAX (20 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FBLAX (0.91). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBLAX (42.27). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBLAX: RLBAX (250) vs FBLAX (1000). FBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.70 vs. RLBAX (12.82). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.84 vs. FBLAX (19.69).
| FBLAX | RLBAX | FBLAX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.32 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.239 | 6.360 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.45B | 288B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.27 | 1.14 | 376% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.70 | 12.82 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.70 | 38.15 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.69 | 26.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.17 | 71.94 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement