Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBMCX vs RLBAX
FBMCX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FBMCX vs RLBAX
Franklin Managed Income C
Price$12.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.35B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.52
Change+$0.17 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.39B
FBMCX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBMCX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBMCX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 252B vs. FBMCX (3.35B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FBMCX (3.61) vs RLBAX (1.18). FBMCX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FBMCX (19 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). FBMCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than RLBAX (1.31). RLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FBMCX (31.92). RLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMCX: RLBAX (250) vs FBMCX (1000). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. FBMCX (5.74). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.04 vs. FBMCX (25.21).
| FBMCX | RLBAX | FBMCX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.31 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.66 | 1.31 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.543 | 7.651 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 252B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 1.18 | 306% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.74 | 7.00 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | 32.45 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.21 | 37.04 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.33 | 58.01 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement