Ad is loading...
FBNC
Price
$45.75
Change
-$0.82 (-1.76%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
65 days until earnings call
FETM
Price
$44.99
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

FBNC vs FETM

Header iconFBNC vs FETM Comparison
Open Charts FBNC vs FETMBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$45.75
Change-$0.82 (-1.76%)
Volume$164.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Fentura Financial
Price$44.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$725
CapitalizationN/A
FBNC vs FETM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBNC vs. FETM commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBNC is a Sell and FETM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FBNC: $45.75 vs. FETM: $44.99)
Brand notoriety: FBNC and FETM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBNC: 93% vs. FETM: 13%
Market capitalization -- FBNC: $1.49B vs. FETM: $92.37M
FBNC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.49B. FETM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $92.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFETM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FETM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FBNC and FETM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBNC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FBNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FBNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.84% price change this week, while FETM (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

FETM is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBNC($1.49B) has a higher market cap than FETM($92.4M). FBNC has higher P/E ratio than FETM: FBNC (13.96) vs FETM (5.83). FETM YTD gains are higher at: 67.885 vs. FBNC (25.958). FETM (100M) and FBNC (95.3M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FETM has less debt than FBNC: FETM (259M) vs FBNC (571M). FBNC has higher revenues than FETM: FBNC (404M) vs FETM (61.3M).
FBNCFETMFBNC / FETM
Capitalization1.49B92.4M1,608%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.95867.88538%
P/E Ratio13.965.83240%
Revenue404M61.3M659%
Total Cash95.3M100M95%
Total Debt571M259M220%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBNC vs FETM: Fundamental Ratings
FBNC
FETM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4913
SMR RATING
1..100
1549
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4136
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FETM's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as FBNC (81) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to FBNC’s over the last 12 months.

FETM's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FBNC (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FBNC’s over the last 12 months.

FBNC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FETM (49) in the null industry. This means that FBNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FETM’s over the last 12 months.

FETM's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FBNC (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to FBNC’s over the last 12 months.

FETM's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FBNC (18) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FETM’s stock grew similarly to FBNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTR63.600.10
+0.16%
Ventas
DSS1.06-0.01
-0.93%
DSS
HCC65.56-0.91
-1.37%
Warrior Met Coal
BJRI35.81-0.56
-1.54%
BJ's Restaurants
OXSQ2.70-0.06
-2.35%
Oxford Square Capital Corp

FBNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBNC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBNC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBNC
1D Price
Change %
FBNC100%
-1.76%
UBSI - FBNC
88%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FCF - FBNC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
UCB - FBNC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
TOWN - FBNC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
WSBC - FBNC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More

FETM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FETM has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FETM jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FETM
1D Price
Change %
FETM100%
-0.02%
FUNC - FETM
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
FBNC - FETM
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
HBNC - FETM
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
EFSC - FETM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
PNFP - FETM
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More