Ad is loading...
FBOT vs GBUY
FBOT vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts FBOT vs GBUY
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
Price$23.59
Change-$1.47 (-5.87%)
Volume$200
Net Assets100.42M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$30.46
Change-$1.31 (-4.12%)
Volume$100
Net Assets16.72M
FBOT vs GBUY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBOT vs. GBUY commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBOT is a Hold and GBUY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBOT has more net assets: 100M vs. GBUY (16.7M). GBUY has a higher annual dividend yield than FBOT: GBUY (-9.679) vs FBOT (-11.013). FBOT was incepted earlier than GBUY: FBOT (5 years) vs GBUY (3 years). FBOT (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than GBUY (0.75). FBOT has a higher turnover GBUY (31.00) vs GBUY (31.00).
| FBOT | GBUY | FBOT / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | -11.013 | -9.679 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 100M | 16.7M | 599% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.75 | 67% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 31.00 | 168% |
| Yield | 0.50 | 1.42 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBOT | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with TER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then TER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | -5.36% | ||
| TER - FBOT | 76% Closely correlated | -10.20% | ||
| SNPS - FBOT | 67% Closely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| ADSK - FBOT | 63% Loosely correlated | -4.02% | ||
| PTC - FBOT | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.85% | ||
| AMZN - FBOT | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been loosely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | -4.85% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -7.71% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -8.90% | ||
| META - GBUY | 56% Loosely correlated | -8.96% | ||
| TER - GBUY | 54% Loosely correlated | -10.20% | ||
More | ||||