Ad is loading...
FBRNX vs GFAFX
FBRNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FBRNX vs GFAFX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel I
Price$73.47
Change+$6.46 (+9.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.18
Change+$6.48 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
FBRNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBRNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBRNX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. FBRNX (6.66B). FBRNX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FBRNX (0.78) vs GFAFX (0.35). FBRNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FBRNX (12 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FBRNX (0.48). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FBRNX (3.00). FBRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FBRNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FBRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.45 vs. GFAFX (-12.13). FBRNX return over 5 years is better than : 65.52 vs. GFAFX (36.47).
| FBRNX | GFAFX | FBRNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.67 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.67 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.789 | -16.350 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.66B | 246B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.35 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.45 | -12.13 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.95 | -3.17 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.52 | 36.47 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.07 | 39.06 | 215% |