Ad is loading...
FBTAX vs JFNCX
FBTAX vs JFNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTAX vs. JFNCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTAX is a Hold and JFNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFNCX has more cash in the bank: 4.71B vs. FBTAX (1.39B). FBTAX pays higher dividends than JFNCX: FBTAX (2.97) vs JFNCX (0.00). FBTAX was incepted earlier than JFNCX: FBTAX (24 years) vs JFNCX (16 years). JFNCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FBTAX (0.96). FBTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. JFNCX (35.00). FBTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JFNCX: FBTAX (0) vs JFNCX (2500). JFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -16.59 vs. FBTAX (-23.65). JFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.65 vs. FBTAX (-11.38).
| FBTAX | JFNCX | FBTAX / JFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.76 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.76 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -18.964 | -9.315 | 204% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 4.71B | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.65 | -16.59 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.29 | -13.07 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.38 | 4.65 | -245% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.65 | -10.62 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers