Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBTDX vs FSPHX
FBTDX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBTDX vs. FSPHX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBTDX is a Hold and FSPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.86B vs. FBTDX (690M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FBTDX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FBTDX (0.00). FBTDX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FBTDX (11 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FBTDX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FBTDX (35.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBTDX: FSPHX (0) vs FBTDX (1000). FSPHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.10 vs. FBTDX (-17.36). FSPHX return over 5 years is better than : -13.61 vs. FBTDX (-35.06).
| FBTDX | FSPHX | FBTDX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.63 | 286% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.63 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.782 | -6.569 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 690M | 5.86B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.36 | -12.10 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.21 | -1.76 | -695% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.06 | -13.61 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.90 | 9.32 | -492% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement