Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FBZ vs ILF
FBZ vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FBZ vs ILF
First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX® ETF
Price$12.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$950
Net Assets7.21M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$26.51
Change+$0.23 (+0.88%)
Volume$1.07M
Net Assets1.65B
FBZ vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FBZ vs. ILF commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBZ is a Buy and ILF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.65B vs. FBZ (7.21M). FBZ has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: FBZ (34.428) vs ILF (29.767). FBZ was incepted earlier than ILF: FBZ (14 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than FBZ (0.80). FBZ has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| FBZ | ILF | FBZ / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 34.428 | 29.767 | 116% |
| Net Assets | 7.21M | 1.65B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.48 | 167% |
| Turnover | 63.00 | 18.00 | 350% |
| Yield | 3.80 | 5.69 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FBZ | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FBZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBZ has been loosely correlated with XP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FBZ jumps, then XP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBZ | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| XP - FBZ | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| INTR - FBZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.08% | ||
| STNE - FBZ | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| PAGS - FBZ | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| NU - FBZ | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.10% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +4.45% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | +4.68% | ||
| NU - ILF | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||