Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAKX vs RGACX
FCAKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCAKX vs RGACX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$42.60
Change-$0.76 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.13B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$73.29
Change+$0.27 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.16B
FCAKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAKX vs. RGACX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAKX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 297B vs. FCAKX (6.13B). FCAKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCAKX (0.24) vs RGACX (0.08). FCAKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCAKX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FCAKX (0.49). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCAKX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.89 vs. FCAKX (-5.14). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.64 vs. FCAKX (30.74).
| FCAKX | RGACX | FCAKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.94 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.94 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.264 | 1.431 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.13B | 297B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.08 | 281% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.14 | 4.89 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.92 | 39.44 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 44.64 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.44 | 62.83 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers