Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAKX vs RGACX
FCAKX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FCAKX vs RGACX
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K
Price$43.47
Change-$0.62 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.55B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$75.52
Change-$0.91 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
FCAKX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAKX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAKX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. FCAKX (6.55B). FCAKX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FCAKX (0.22) vs RGACX (0.08). FCAKX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FCAKX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FCAKX (0.49). FCAKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FCAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FCAKX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.70 vs. FCAKX (-6.15). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 46.78 vs. FCAKX (29.45).
| FCAKX | RGACX | FCAKX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.94 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.94 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.986 | 4.903 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.55B | 310B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.08 | 285% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.15 | 6.70 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.67 | 51.90 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.45 | 46.78 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 69.68 | 24% |