Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAMX vs FKTQX
FCAMX vs FKTQX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FKTQX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A1
Price$9.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.56
Change+$0.02 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.49B
FCAMX vs FKTQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FKTQX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FKTQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FCAMX (2.93B). FCAMX pays higher dividends than FKTQX: FCAMX (4.28) vs FKTQX (3.90). FCAMX was incepted earlier than FKTQX: FCAMX (32 years) vs FKTQX (8 years). FCAMX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). FCAMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.33 vs. FKTQX (7.96). FCAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: FCAMX (1000) vs FKTQX (1000000). FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.43 vs. FKTQX (-0.56). FCAMX return over 5 years is better than : -1.81 vs. FKTQX (-3.29).
| FCAMX | FKTQX | FCAMX / FKTQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.48 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.48 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.346 | -2.241 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 12.5B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.28 | 3.90 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.43 | -0.56 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.38 | 5.81 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.81 | -3.29 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement