Ad is loading...
FCAMX vs FKTQX
FCAMX vs FKTQX Comparison
Open Charts FCAMX vs FKTQX
Franklin CA High Yield Municipal A1
Price$9.48
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.91B
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.44B
FCAMX vs FKTQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAMX vs. FKTQX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAMX is a Hold and FKTQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. FCAMX (2.91B). FCAMX pays higher dividends than FKTQX: FCAMX (4.16) vs FKTQX (3.81). FCAMX was incepted earlier than FKTQX: FCAMX (32 years) vs FKTQX (8 years). FCAMX (0.69) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). FKTQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.01 vs. FCAMX (10.93). FCAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: FCAMX (1000) vs FKTQX (1000000). FCAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.14 vs. FKTQX (1.50). FCAMX return over 5 years is better than : 2.76 vs. FKTQX (0.42).
| FCAMX | FKTQX | FCAMX / FKTQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.48 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.48 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.560 | -2.610 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 12.4B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.16 | 3.81 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.14 | 1.50 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.66 | 3.73 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.76 | 0.42 | 663% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.72 | N/A | - |