FCAP
Price
$44.85
Change
-$1.90 (-4.06%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.66M
NIC
Price
$116.74
Change
-$3.50 (-2.91%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.25B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCAP vs NIC

Header iconFCAP vs NIC Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs NICBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$44.85
Change-$1.90 (-4.06%)
Volume$100
Capitalization95.66M
Nicolet Bankshares
Price$116.74
Change-$3.50 (-2.91%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.25B
FCAP vs NIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCAP vs. NIC commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Hold and NIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FCAP: $46.75 vs. NIC: $120.24)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and NIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 59% vs. NIC: 134%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $95.66M vs. NIC: $1.25B
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.66M. NIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNIC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NIC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIC is a better buy in the long-term than FCAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NIC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • NIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.59% price change this week, while NIC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCAP is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

NIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIC($1.25B) has a higher market cap than FCAP($95.7M). NIC has higher P/E ratio than FCAP: NIC (20.55) vs FCAP (7.67). FCAP YTD gains are higher at: 46.074 vs. NIC (15.190). NIC has more cash in the bank: 130M vs. FCAP (18M). FCAP has less debt than NIC: FCAP (28M) vs NIC (167M). NIC has higher revenues than FCAP: NIC (278M) vs FCAP (42.9M).
FCAPNICFCAP / NIC
Capitalization95.7M1.25B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.07415.190303%
P/E Ratio7.6720.5537%
Revenue42.9M278M15%
Total Cash18M130M14%
Total Debt28M167M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs NIC: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
NIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8423
SMR RATING
1..100
2210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1429
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCAP's Valuation (79) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NIC (86) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCAP (84) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

NIC's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (22) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that NIC’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NIC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as NIC (29) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to NIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGWAX33.230.01
+0.03%
Vanguard Global Wellington Admiral
MYIEX9.06N/A
N/A
MassMutual International Eq Svc
TRGMX20.88N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Mid Cap Growth Retire
TRSZX20.92N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Z
AGVHX25.71-0.01
-0.04%
American Funds Global Insight F-3

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCAP and UBFO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCAP and UBFO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
-1.88%
UBFO - FCAP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
OPHC - FCAP
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
LNKB - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
NIC - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
FULT - FCAP
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
More