Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCAVX vs LCFFX
FCAVX vs LCFFX Comparison
Open Charts FCAVX vs LCFFX
Franklin CA Tax Free Income Adv
Price$6.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
Lord Abbett California Tax Free F
Price$9.70
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets643.63M
FCAVX vs LCFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCAVX vs. LCFFX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAVX is a Hold and LCFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAVX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. LCFFX (644M). FCAVX pays higher dividends than LCFFX: FCAVX (3.86) vs LCFFX (3.61). FCAVX was incepted earlier than LCFFX: FCAVX (24 years) vs LCFFX (18 years). LCFFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FCAVX (0.52). LCFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FCAVX (7.96). FCAVX (0) and LCFFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCAVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.04 vs. LCFFX (-1.34). LCFFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.64 vs. FCAVX (-3.55).
| FCAVX | LCFFX | FCAVX / LCFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.67 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.263 | -2.711 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 644M | 1,941% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.86 | 3.61 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.04 | -1.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.35 | 8.87 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.55 | -1.64 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.14 | 9.73 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement