FCBC
Price
$38.85
Change
+$0.85 (+2.24%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
639.64M
11 days until earnings call
HIFS
Price
$240.41
Change
+$3.12 (+1.31%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
378.65M
Ad is loading...

FCBC vs HIFS

Header iconFCBC vs HIFS Comparison
Open Charts FCBC vs HIFSBanner chart's image
First Community Bankshares
Price$38.85
Change+$0.85 (+2.24%)
Volume$56.47K
Capitalization639.64M
Hingham Institution for Savings
Price$240.41
Change+$3.12 (+1.31%)
Volume$11.18K
Capitalization378.65M
FCBC vs HIFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCBC vs. HIFS commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBC is a Hold and HIFS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FCBC: $38.85 vs. HIFS: $240.41)
Brand notoriety: FCBC and HIFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCBC: 142% vs. HIFS: 69%
Market capitalization -- FCBC: $639.64M vs. HIFS: $378.65M
FCBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $639.64M. HIFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $378.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHIFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HIFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCBC is a better buy in the long-term than HIFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HIFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FCBC and HIFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FCBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.97% price change this week, while HIFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

HIFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCBC($640M) has a higher market cap than HIFS($379M). HIFS has higher P/E ratio than FCBC: HIFS (14.46) vs FCBC (12.41). FCBC YTD gains are higher at: -1.371 vs. HIFS (-5.170). FCBC has more cash in the bank: 71.7M vs. HIFS (6.76M). FCBC has less debt than HIFS: FCBC (1M) vs HIFS (1.47B). FCBC has higher revenues than HIFS: FCBC (156M) vs HIFS (64.6M).
FCBCHIFSFCBC / HIFS
Capitalization640M379M169%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.371-5.17027%
P/E Ratio12.4114.4686%
Revenue156M64.6M241%
Total Cash71.7M6.76M1,060%
Total Debt1M1.47B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCBC vs HIFS: Fundamental Ratings
FCBC
HIFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2220
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2267
SMR RATING
1..100
1220
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCBC's Valuation (88) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (95) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCBC’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HIFS (67) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HIFS (20) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCBC’s stock grew similarly to HIFS’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCBC (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FCBC’s over the last 12 months.

HIFS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCBC (30) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that HIFS’s stock grew similarly to FCBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCBCHIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HIFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRGIX96.69N/A
N/A
Bridges Investment Fund
QNTIX32.00N/A
N/A
Meeder Sector Rotation Institutional
UBVCX65.04N/A
N/A
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val C
DIEFX13.02N/A
N/A
Destinations International Equity I
FIKBX33.35N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Financials Z

FCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCBC has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCBC jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCBC
1D Price
Change %
FCBC100%
+2.24%
PEBO - FCBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
FMBH - FCBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
NWBI - FCBC
88%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
CTBI - FCBC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
TCBK - FCBC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
More

HIFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIFS has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIFS jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIFS
1D Price
Change %
HIFS100%
+1.31%
UBSI - HIFS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
FCBC - HIFS
80%
Closely correlated
+2.24%
FFBC - HIFS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
IBOC - HIFS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
BHLB - HIFS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
More