FCBC
Price
$43.99
Change
+$0.09 (+0.21%)
Updated
Jul 10, 11:01 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
818.06M
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$56.60
Change
+$0.47 (+0.84%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
969.61M
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCBC vs MBWM

FCBC vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCBC vs. MBWM commentary
Jul 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCBC is a Buy and MBWM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2026
Stock price -- (FCBC: $43.90 vs. MBWM: $56.60)
Brand notoriety: FCBC and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCBC: 23% vs. MBWM: 32%
Market capitalization -- FCBC: $818.06M vs. MBWM: $969.61M
FCBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $818.06M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $969.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FCBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCBC is a better buy in the short-term than MBWM.

Price Growth

FCBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.70% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($970M) has a higher market cap than FCBC($818M). FCBC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: FCBC (16.42) vs MBWM (10.13). FCBC YTD gains are higher at: 36.183 vs. MBWM (19.447). FCBC has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. MBWM (48.4M). FCBC has less debt than MBWM: FCBC (1M) vs MBWM (484M). MBWM has higher revenues than FCBC: MBWM (253M) vs FCBC (161M).
FCBCMBWMFCBC / MBWM
Capitalization818M970M84%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD36.18319.447186%
P/E Ratio16.4210.13162%
Revenue161M253M64%
Total Cash126M48.4M260%
Total Debt1M484M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCBC vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FCBC
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9042
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3117
SMR RATING
1..100
6346
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4052
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBWM's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCBC (61). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FCBC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCBC (31). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FCBC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCBC (63). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FCBC’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCBC (46). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FCBC’s over the last 12 months.

FCBC's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (52). This means that FCBC’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCBCMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNWBX100.68N/A
N/A
American Funds New World R-2
HAOYX25.47N/A
N/A
Hartford International Opportunities Y
ILLLX28.58N/A
N/A
Transamerica Capital Growth C
CPECX21.83N/A
N/A
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha C
IVIPX33.83N/A
N/A
VY® Invesco Equity and Income S2

FCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCBC has been closely correlated with MCBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCBC jumps, then MCBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCBC
1D Price
Change %
FCBC100%
+1.25%
MCBS - FCBC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.46%
THFF - FCBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
MBWM - FCBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
IBCP - FCBC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
BHRB - FCBC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.82%
More