FCCO
Price
$23.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
90 days until earnings call
FISB
Price
$14.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

FCCO vs FISB

Header iconFCCO vs FISB Comparison
Open Charts FCCO vs FISBBanner chart's image
First Community
Price$23.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$45.49K
CapitalizationN/A
1st Capital Ban
Price$14.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$950
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FCCO vs FISB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FCCO vs. FISB commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCO is a Buy and FISB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FCCO: $23.21 vs. FISB: $14.00)
Brand notoriety: FCCO and FISB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCCO: 59% vs. FISB: 50%
Market capitalization -- FCCO: $132.97M vs. FISB: $55.09M
FCCO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $132.97M. FISB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $55.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCCO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFISB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FISB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCCO is a better buy in the long-term than FISB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCCO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FCCO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FCCO (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.74% price change this week, while FISB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCCO is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCO($133M) has a higher market cap than FISB($55.1M). FCCO has higher P/E ratio than FISB: FCCO (11.14) vs FISB (9.86). FISB YTD gains are higher at: 17.155 vs. FCCO (10.056). FISB has less debt than FCCO: FISB (69.8M) vs FCCO (108M). FCCO has higher revenues than FISB: FCCO (54.5M) vs FISB (33.5M).
FCCOFISBFCCO / FISB
Capitalization133M55.1M241%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.05617.15559%
P/E Ratio11.149.86113%
Revenue54.5M33.5M163%
Total Cash27.8MN/A-
Total Debt108M69.8M155%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCCO vs FISB: Fundamental Ratings
FCCO
FISB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1727
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40100
SMR RATING
1..100
5162
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCCO's Valuation (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FISB (70) in the null industry. This means that FCCO’s stock grew similarly to FISB’s over the last 12 months.

FCCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FISB (100) in the null industry. This means that FCCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FISB’s over the last 12 months.

FCCO's SMR Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FISB (62) in the null industry. This means that FCCO’s stock grew similarly to FISB’s over the last 12 months.

FISB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FCCO (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FISB’s stock grew similarly to FCCO’s over the last 12 months.

FCCO's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FISB (30) in the null industry. This means that FCCO’s stock grew similarly to FISB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

FCCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCCO has been loosely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCCO jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCCO
1D Price
Change %
FCCO100%
+8.38%
THFF - FCCO
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
BHB - FCCO
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
TSBK - FCCO
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
HTH - FCCO
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
RBCAA - FCCO
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
More

FISB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FISB and CWBC have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FISB and CWBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FISB
1D Price
Change %
FISB100%
N/A
CWBC - FISB
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
CEFC - FISB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORRF - FISB
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.04%
PCB - FISB
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
FCCO - FISB
27%
Poorly correlated
+8.38%
More