Ad is loading...
FCCQX vs SRCMX
FCCQX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts FCCQX vs SRCMX
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc A
Price$10.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
Principal California Municipal A
Price$9.60
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets615.02M
FCCQX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCQX vs. SRCMX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCQX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCQX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. SRCMX (615M). SRCMX pays higher dividends than FCCQX: SRCMX (3.25) vs FCCQX (3.04). FCCQX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: FCCQX (7 years) vs SRCMX (36 years). SRCMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FCCQX (0.82). SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.90 vs. FCCQX (16.05). SRCMX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCCQX (2%) vs FCCQX (2%). FCCQX (1000) and SRCMX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.81 vs. SRCMX (1.54). SRCMX return over 5 years is better than : 3.84 vs. FCCQX (0.05).
| FCCQX | SRCMX | FCCQX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.87 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.641 | -1.160 | 55% |
| Front Load | 2% | 4% | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 615M | 215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 3.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.81 | 1.54 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.66 | 4.75 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.05 | 3.84 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers