Ad is loading...
FCCRX vs SRCMX
FCCRX vs SRCMX Comparison
Open Charts FCCRX vs SRCMX
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc R6
Price$10.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
Principal California Municipal A
Price$9.60
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets615.02M
FCCRX vs SRCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCRX vs. SRCMX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCRX is a Hold and SRCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCRX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. SRCMX (615M). FCCRX (3.33) and SRCMX (3.25) have matching dividends . FCCRX was incepted earlier than SRCMX: FCCRX (8 years) vs SRCMX (36 years). SRCMX (0.87) is less costly to investors than FCCRX (0.52). SRCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.90 vs. FCCRX (16.05). SRCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCCRX: SRCMX (1000) vs FCCRX (1000000). FCCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.10 vs. SRCMX (1.54). SRCMX return over 5 years is better than : 3.84 vs. FCCRX (0.99).
| FCCRX | SRCMX | FCCRX / SRCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.87 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.87 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.547 | -1.160 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 615M | 215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 3.25 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.10 | 1.54 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.34 | 4.75 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.99 | 3.84 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...