FCF
Price
$14.47
Change
-$1.13 (-7.24%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.42B
25 days until earnings call
HFWA
Price
$22.50
Change
-$2.00 (-8.16%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
671.96M
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FCF vs HFWA

Header iconFCF vs HFWA Comparison
Open Charts FCF vs HFWABanner chart's image
First Commonwealth Financial
Price$14.47
Change-$1.13 (-7.24%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization1.42B
Heritage Financial
Price$22.50
Change-$2.00 (-8.16%)
Volume$328.75K
Capitalization671.96M
FCF vs HFWA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCF vs. HFWA commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCF is a StrongBuy and HFWA is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FCF: $14.47 vs. HFWA: $22.50)
Brand notoriety: FCF and HFWA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCF: 152% vs. HFWA: 111%
Market capitalization -- FCF: $1.42B vs. HFWA: $671.96M
FCF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.42B. HFWA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $671.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHFWA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HFWA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than HFWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HFWA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HFWA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the short-term than HFWA.

Price Growth

FCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.13% price change this week, while HFWA (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

HFWA is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.56% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCF($1.42B) has a higher market cap than HFWA($672M). HFWA has higher P/E ratio than FCF: HFWA (10.83) vs FCF (8.86). HFWA YTD gains are higher at: -7.297 vs. FCF (-13.826). FCF has more cash in the bank: 123M vs. HFWA (55.9M). HFWA has less debt than FCF: HFWA (21.8M) vs FCF (750M). FCF has higher revenues than HFWA: FCF (482M) vs HFWA (244M).
FCFHFWAFCF / HFWA
Capitalization1.42B672M212%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.826-7.297189%
P/E Ratio8.8610.8382%
Revenue482M244M198%
Total Cash123M55.9M220%
Total Debt750M21.8M3,440%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCF vs HFWA: Fundamental Ratings
FCF
HFWA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
715
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2770
SMR RATING
1..100
1422
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
269
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCF's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (62). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HFWA (70). This means that FCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HFWA (22). This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to HFWA’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (56). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

HFWA's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (26). This means that HFWA’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFHFWA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HFWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCANX11.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% C
AIAGX10.73N/A
N/A
abrdn Real Estate Fund A
UBVRX77.68N/A
N/A
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R2
PMCKX23.51N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Mid Cap Value R6
SMINX11.70N/A
N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Intl Mgd Vol F (SIMT)

HFWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFWA has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFWA jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HFWA
1D Price
Change %
HFWA100%
-8.16%
NWBI - HFWA
91%
Closely correlated
-5.51%
UBSI - HFWA
90%
Closely correlated
-6.83%
BANR - HFWA
88%
Closely correlated
-8.41%
FCF - HFWA
88%
Closely correlated
-7.24%
HBNC - HFWA
88%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
More