FCF
Price
$15.66
Change
-$0.32 (-2.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.42B
79 days until earnings call
LARK
Price
$29.69
Change
+$0.88 (+3.05%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
105.44M
Ad is loading...

FCF vs LARK

Header iconFCF vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts FCF vs LARKBanner chart's image
First Commonwealth Financial
Price$15.66
Change-$0.32 (-2.00%)
Volume$455.57K
Capitalization1.42B
Landmark Ban
Price$29.69
Change+$0.88 (+3.05%)
Volume$76.52K
Capitalization105.44M
FCF vs LARK Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCF vs. LARK commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCF is a StrongBuy and LARK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FCF: $15.66 vs. LARK: $29.69)
Brand notoriety: FCF and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCF: 49% vs. LARK: 262%
Market capitalization -- FCF: $1.42B vs. LARK: $105.44M
FCF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.42B. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $105.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the long-term than FCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LARK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the short-term than LARK.

Price Growth

FCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

LARK is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCF($1.42B) has a higher market cap than LARK($105M). FCF (8.86) and LARK (8.64) have similar P/E ratio . LARK YTD gains are higher at: 24.697 vs. FCF (-5.944). LARK has less debt than FCF: LARK (99M) vs FCF (750M). FCF has higher revenues than LARK: FCF (482M) vs LARK (56.5M).
FCFLARKFCF / LARK
Capitalization1.42B105M1,355%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.94424.697-24%
P/E Ratio8.868.64102%
Revenue482M56.5M853%
Total Cash123MN/A-
Total Debt750M99M758%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCF vs LARK: Fundamental Ratings
FCF
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3284
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2218
SMR RATING
1..100
1019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5338
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1821
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCF's Valuation (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (59) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (22) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (19) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (21) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFLARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBIEX14.000.08
+0.57%
Bridge Builder International Equity
FSAVX56.380.17
+0.30%
Fidelity Select Automotive Port
GEIZX15.33-0.01
-0.07%
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Index Inv
JUSPX15.36-0.02
-0.13%
JPMorgan US Small Company R3
FTXSX41.52-0.30
-0.72%
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp GrInstl

FCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCF has been closely correlated with BHLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCF jumps, then BHLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCF
1D Price
Change %
FCF100%
-1.17%
BHLB - FCF
91%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
NWBI - FCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
STBA - FCF
90%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
UBSI - FCF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
FFBC - FCF
89%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
More

LARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LARK and UNB have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LARK and UNB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LARK
1D Price
Change %
LARK100%
+3.05%
UNB - LARK
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
SSBI - LARK
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGBI - LARK
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
OVBC - LARK
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.23%
CFFI - LARK
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More