Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCFFX vs RCKTX
FCFFX vs RCKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCFFX vs. RCKTX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCFFX is a Hold and RCKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCKTX has more cash in the bank: 47.8B vs. FCFFX (2.83B). RCKTX pays higher dividends than FCFFX: RCKTX (0.89) vs FCFFX (0.72). FCFFX was incepted earlier than RCKTX: FCFFX (22 years) vs RCKTX (18 years). FCFFX (1.67) is less costly to investors than RCKTX (1.00). FCFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RCKTX (6.00). FCFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCKTX: FCFFX (0) vs RCKTX (250). RCKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.46 vs. FCFFX (6.34). RCKTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.78 vs. FCFFX (29.24).
| FCFFX | RCKTX | FCFFX / RCKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.00 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.00 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.647 | 10.615 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.83B | 47.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.89 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.34 | 12.46 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.57 | 38.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.24 | 43.78 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.88 | 74.55 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement