Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs FCLSX
FCGTX vs FCLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. FCLSX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and FCLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.1B vs. FCLSX (69.1M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: FCLSX (2.13) vs FCGTX (1.51). FCGTX was incepted earlier than FCLSX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FCLSX (8 years). FCGTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.01). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FCLSX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.41 vs. FCLSX (7.57). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. FCGTX (43.12).
| FCGTX | FCLSX | FCGTX / FCLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.01 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.01 | 3,600% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.158 | 4.827 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.1B | 69.1M | 66,715% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.13 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.41 | 7.57 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 30.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.12 | 47.93 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement