Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs FCLSX
FCGTX vs FCLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. FCLSX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and FCLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 48.1B vs. FCLSX (72.8M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: FCLSX (2.04) vs FCGTX (1.44). FCGTX was incepted earlier than FCLSX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FCLSX (8 years). FCGTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.00). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FCLSX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.83 vs. FCLSX (7.83). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 49.18 vs. FCGTX (43.68).
| FCGTX | FCLSX | FCGTX / FCLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.459 | 9.241 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.1B | 72.8M | 66,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 2.04 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.83 | 7.83 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.69 | 47.08 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.68 | 49.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement