Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs FCLSX
FCGTX vs FCLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. FCLSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and FCLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 44.2B vs. FCLSX (66.8M). FCLSX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: FCLSX (2.17) vs FCGTX (1.59). FCGTX was incepted earlier than FCLSX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FCLSX (8 years). FCGTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than FCLSX (0.01). FCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FCLSX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. FCLSX (5.69). FCLSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.76 vs. FCGTX (45.66).
| FCGTX | FCLSX | FCGTX / FCLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.01 | 3,600% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.01 | 3,600% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.515 | 2.124 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 66.8M | 66,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 2.17 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.41 | 5.69 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.96 | 33.54 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.66 | 55.76 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers