Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs FFFFX
FCGTX vs FFFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. FFFFX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and FFFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 44B vs. FFFFX (27.6B). FCGTX pays higher dividends than FFFFX: FCGTX (1.59) vs FFFFX (1.38). FCGTX was incepted earlier than FFFFX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FFFFX (25 years). FFFFX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FFFFX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. FFFFX (7.83). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 50.51 vs. FFFFX (39.56).
| FCGTX | FFFFX | FCGTX / FFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.73 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.73 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.808 | 1.210 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44B | 27.6B | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.38 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 7.83 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.47 | 15.42 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.51 | 39.56 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...