Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs FHJFX
FCGTX vs FHJFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. FHJFX commentary
Jun 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and FHJFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. FHJFX (3.75B). FHJFX (1.57) and FCGTX (1.51) have matching dividends . FCGTX was incepted earlier than FHJFX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FHJFX (7 years). FHJFX (0.47) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FHJFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FHJFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FHJFX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.56 vs. FHJFX (8.69). FHJFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.09 vs. FCGTX (44.83).
| FCGTX | FHJFX | FCGTX / FHJFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.47 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.47 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 5.816 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.7B | 3.75B | 1,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.57 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 8.69 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.30 | 40.59 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.83 | 49.09 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement