Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs FHZEX
FCGTX vs FHZEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. FHZEX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and FHZEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.6B vs. FHZEX (3.75B). FCGTX pays higher dividends than FHZEX: FCGTX (1.51) vs FHZEX (0.95). FCGTX was incepted earlier than FHZEX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FHZEX (7 years). FHZEX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FHZEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FHZEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FHZEX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.18 vs. FHZEX (8.01). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.63 vs. FHZEX (41.95).
| FCGTX | FHZEX | FCGTX / FHZEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.49 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.49 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.843 | 5.624 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.6B | 3.75B | 1,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 0.95 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.18 | 8.01 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.99 | 40.55 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.63 | 41.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement