Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs FHZEX
FCGTX vs FHZEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. FHZEX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and FHZEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 45.4B vs. FHZEX (3.53B). FCGTX pays higher dividends than FHZEX: FCGTX (1.59) vs FHZEX (1.00). FCGTX was incepted earlier than FHZEX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FHZEX (7 years). FHZEX (1.49) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FHZEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FHZEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FHZEX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. FHZEX (7.17). FHZEX (47.85) and FCGTX (47.82) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | FHZEX | FCGTX / FHZEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.49 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.49 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.057 | 4.797 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4B | 3.53B | 1,285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.00 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 7.17 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.89 | 32.97 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.82 | 47.85 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement