Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs FSNVX
FCGTX vs FSNVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. FSNVX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and FSNVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.9B vs. FSNVX (30.3B). FCGTX (1.44) and FSNVX (1.43) have matching dividends . FCGTX was incepted earlier than FSNVX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FSNVX (8 years). FSNVX (0.63) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FSNVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FSNVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FSNVX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.48 vs. FSNVX (6.43). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.52 vs. FSNVX (32.96).
| FCGTX | FSNVX | FCGTX / FSNVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.63 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.63 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.802 | 7.785 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.9B | 30.3B | 158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.43 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 6.43 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 45.05 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.52 | 32.96 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers