Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs FSYBX
FCGTX vs FSYBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 44.6B vs. FSYBX (8.16M). FCGTX pays higher dividends than FSYBX: FCGTX (1.59) vs FSYBX (1.36). FCGTX was incepted earlier than FSYBX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FSYBX (2 years). FSYBX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FSYBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FSYBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FSYBX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FSYBX (10.03) and FCGTX (9.96) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FCGTX | FSYBX | FCGTX / FSYBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.808 | 2.219 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.6B | 8.16M | 546,636% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.36 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 10.03 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.47 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.51 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |