Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs FSYBX
FCGTX vs FSYBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. FSYBX (10.3M). FCGTX pays higher dividends than FSYBX: FCGTX (1.51) vs FSYBX (1.30). FCGTX was incepted earlier than FSYBX: FCGTX (8 years) vs FSYBX (2 years). FSYBX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FSYBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FSYBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: FSYBX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. FSYBX (10.55).
| FCGTX | FSYBX | FCGTX / FSYBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.49 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 5.752 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 10.3M | 450,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.30 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 10.55 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.72 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.08 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TRIGX | 20.84 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price International Value Eq | |||
| NSVAX | 13.39 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst | |||
| SGTTX | 74.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst2 | |||
| KCVSX | 17.51 | N/A | N/A |
| Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S | |||
| LEOIX | 8.98 | N/A | N/A |
| Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Instl | |||