Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs JOBEX
FCGTX vs JOBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. JOBEX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and JOBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 43.6B vs. JOBEX (2.75B). JOBEX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: JOBEX (2.28) vs FCGTX (1.60). FCGTX was incepted earlier than JOBEX: FCGTX (8 years) vs JOBEX (13 years). JOBEX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). JOBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and JOBEX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. JOBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. FCGTX (7.01). JOBEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.17 vs. FCGTX (44.60).
| FCGTX | JOBEX | FCGTX / JOBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.42 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.65 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.098 | -0.353 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 2.75B | 1,583% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 2.28 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 8.52 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.08 | 18.48 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.60 | 57.17 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers