Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs MLFIX
FCGTX vs MLFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. MLFIX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and MLFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. MLFIX (796M). MLFIX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: MLFIX (2.73) vs FCGTX (1.51). FCGTX was incepted earlier than MLFIX: FCGTX (8 years) vs MLFIX (20 years). MLFIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). MLFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). MLFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: MLFIX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. MLFIX (8.16). FCGTX (41.08) and MLFIX (40.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | MLFIX | FCGTX / MLFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.56 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.76 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 5.201 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 796M | 5,829% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.73 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 8.16 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.72 | 18.96 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.08 | 40.92 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement