Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs MLFIX
FCGTX vs MLFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. MLFIX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and MLFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.8B vs. MLFIX (806M). MLFIX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: MLFIX (2.73) vs FCGTX (1.51). FCGTX was incepted earlier than MLFIX: FCGTX (8 years) vs MLFIX (20 years). MLFIX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). MLFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). MLFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: MLFIX (0) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.92 vs. MLFIX (10.11). MLFIX (51.47) and FCGTX (50.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | MLFIX | FCGTX / MLFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.56 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.76 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.824 | 7.981 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.8B | 806M | 5,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.73 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.92 | 10.11 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.21 | 30.75 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.43 | 51.47 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers