Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs NSFHX
FCGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.9B vs. NSFHX (11.3M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: NSFHX (1.58) vs FCGTX (1.44). FCGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FCGTX (8 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and NSFHX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.48 vs. NSFHX (3.15). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.52 vs. NSFHX (21.75).
| FCGTX | NSFHX | FCGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.48 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.20 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.802 | 4.974 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.9B | 11.3M | 423,894% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.58 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 3.15 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 33.31 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.52 | 21.75 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement