Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs NSFHX
FCGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. NSFHX (23.6M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: NSFHX (1.64) vs FCGTX (1.51). FCGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FCGTX (8 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and NSFHX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.65 vs. NSFHX (4.04). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.08 vs. NSFHX (19.08).
| FCGTX | NSFHX | FCGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.54 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.50 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 1.930 | 339% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 23.6M | 196,610% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.64 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | 4.04 | 263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.43 | 20.93 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.08 | 19.08 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers