Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs NSFHX
FCGTX vs NSFHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. NSFHX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and NSFHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 44.2B vs. NSFHX (25.9M). NSFHX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: NSFHX (1.71) vs FCGTX (1.59). FCGTX was incepted earlier than NSFHX: FCGTX (8 years) vs NSFHX (8 years). NSFHX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). NSFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and NSFHX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.41 vs. NSFHX (1.52). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.66 vs. NSFHX (26.57).
| FCGTX | NSFHX | FCGTX / NSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.54 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.50 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.515 | -1.854 | -82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.2B | 25.9M | 170,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.41 | 1.52 | 487% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.96 | 22.18 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.66 | 26.57 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers