Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs PARDX
FCGTX vs PARDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. PARDX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and PARDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. PARDX (24.9B). FCGTX pays higher dividends than PARDX: FCGTX (1.51) vs PARDX (1.29). FCGTX was incepted earlier than PARDX: FCGTX (8 years) vs PARDX (22 years). PARDX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). PARDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.70 vs. FCGTX (6.00). PARDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: PARDX (2500) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.56 vs. PARDX (7.76). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.83 vs. PARDX (29.45).
| FCGTX | PARDX | FCGTX / PARDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.85 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.85 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.549 | 4.642 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 24.9B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.29 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 7.76 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.30 | 23.67 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.83 | 29.45 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 37.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement