Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs PARDX
FCGTX vs PARDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. PARDX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and PARDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 43.6B vs. PARDX (23.9B). FCGTX pays higher dividends than PARDX: FCGTX (1.60) vs PARDX (1.34). FCGTX was incepted earlier than PARDX: FCGTX (8 years) vs PARDX (22 years). PARDX (0.85) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). PARDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.70 vs. FCGTX (6.00). PARDX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: PARDX (2500) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.87 vs. PARDX (5.87). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.97 vs. PARDX (29.57).
| FCGTX | PARDX | FCGTX / PARDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.85 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.85 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.489 | -0.729 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 23.9B | 182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.34 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.87 | 5.87 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.61 | 11.59 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.97 | 29.57 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers