Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs RAKTX
FCGTX vs RAKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RAKTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RAKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (43.6B) and RAKTX (43.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RAKTX: FCGTX (1.60) vs RAKTX (0.61). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RAKTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RAKTX (18 years). RAKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RAKTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RAKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RAKTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.87 vs. RAKTX (5.63). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.97 vs. RAKTX (37.17).
| FCGTX | RAKTX | FCGTX / RAKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.45 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.45 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.489 | -0.854 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 43.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.61 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.87 | 5.63 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.61 | 15.62 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.97 | 37.17 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 50.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...