Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs RBEKX
FCGTX vs RBEKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RBEKX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RBEKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (43.4B) and RBEKX (43.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RBEKX: FCGTX (1.60) vs RBEKX (0.87). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RBEKX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RBEKX (11 years). RBEKX (1.16) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RBEKX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBEKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RBEKX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. RBEKX (6.44). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.99 vs. RBEKX (42.65).
| FCGTX | RBEKX | FCGTX / RBEKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.16 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.16 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.782 | -1.049 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 43.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.87 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 6.44 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.60 | 15.47 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.99 | 42.65 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...