Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs RBKTX
FCGTX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RBKTX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (43.4B) and RBKTX (43.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FCGTX (1.60) vs RBKTX (0.59). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RBKTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RBKTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. RBKTX (6.09). FCGTX return over 5 years is better than : 46.99 vs. RBKTX (41.02).
| FCGTX | RBKTX | FCGTX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.45 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 1.45 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.782 | -1.159 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.4B | 43.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.59 | 273% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 6.09 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.60 | 14.70 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.99 | 41.02 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...