Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs RHGTX
FCGTX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RHGTX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (45.3B) and RHGTX (45.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCGTX (1.59) vs RHGTX (1.46). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RHGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RHGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RHGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (8.68) and RHGTX (8.48) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (47.47) and RHGTX (46.55) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RHGTX | FCGTX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.812 | 3.736 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.3B | 45.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.46 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 8.48 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.32 | 26.81 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.47 | 46.55 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement