Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs RHGTX
FCGTX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RHGTX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (43.6B) and RHGTX (43.6B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCGTX (1.60) vs RHGTX (1.47). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RHGTX (9 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RHGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RHGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RHGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (6.87) and RHGTX (6.66) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (42.97) and RHGTX (42.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RHGTX | FCGTX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.489 | -0.541 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 43.6B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.47 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.87 | 6.66 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.61 | 18.14 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.97 | 42.12 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...