Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs RHGTX
FCGTX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RHGTX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (48.2B) and RHGTX (47.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCGTX (1.43) vs RHGTX (1.32). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCGTX (9 years) vs RHGTX (10 years). RHGTX (0.50) is less costly to investors than FCGTX (0.36). FCGTX (6.00) and RHGTX (6.00) have comparable annual turnover. RHGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RHGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (12.78) and RHGTX (12.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (41.77) and RHGTX (40.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RHGTX | FCGTX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.117 | 9.980 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.2B | 47.7B | 101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.32 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.78 | 12.56 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.89 | 33.35 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.77 | 40.92 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers