Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs RHGTX
FCGTX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RHGTX commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (46.5B) and RHGTX (46.5B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCGTX (1.64) vs RHGTX (1.53). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RHGTX (9 years). FCGTX (1.00) and RHGTX (1.00) have comparable annual turnover. RHGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RHGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (11.70) and RHGTX (11.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (33.86) and RHGTX (33.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RHGTX | FCGTX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.470 | 3.441 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.5B | 46.5B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.53 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.70 | 11.51 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.51 | 16.04 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.86 | 33.03 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers