Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs RHGTX
FCGTX vs RHGTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. RHGTX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and RHGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX (45.3B) and RHGTX (45.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCGTX pays higher dividends than RHGTX: FCGTX (1.64) vs RHGTX (1.53). FCGTX was incepted earlier than RHGTX: FCGTX (8 years) vs RHGTX (9 years). FCGTX (1.00) and RHGTX (1.00) have comparable annual turnover. RHGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGTX: RHGTX (250) vs FCGTX (1000000). FCGTX (23.19) and RHGTX (22.94) have marching annual gain over last year. FCGTX (35.88) and RHGTX (35.27) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCGTX | RHGTX | FCGTX / RHGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.270 | 16.087 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.3B | 45.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.64 | 1.53 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.19 | 22.94 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.62 | 1.23 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.88 | 35.27 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers