Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs TLZIX
FCGTX vs TLZIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. TLZIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and TLZIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 46.4B vs. TLZIX (10.3B). TLZIX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: TLZIX (2.20) vs FCGTX (1.51). FCGTX was incepted earlier than TLZIX: FCGTX (8 years) vs TLZIX (16 years). FCGTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than TLZIX (0.17). TLZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and TLZIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCGTX (10.95) and TLZIX (10.65) have marching annual gain over last year. TLZIX return over 5 years is better than : 55.04 vs. FCGTX (41.53).
| FCGTX | TLZIX | FCGTX / TLZIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.10 | 360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.17 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.892 | 5.533 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.4B | 10.3B | 450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 2.20 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.95 | 10.65 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.92 | 31.71 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.53 | 55.04 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers