Ad is loading...
FCGTX vs TLZIX
FCGTX vs TLZIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. TLZIX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and TLZIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 43.6B vs. TLZIX (9.62B). TLZIX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: TLZIX (2.30) vs FCGTX (1.60). FCGTX was incepted earlier than TLZIX: FCGTX (8 years) vs TLZIX (16 years). FCGTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than TLZIX (0.17). TLZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and TLZIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TLZIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.07 vs. FCGTX (6.87). TLZIX return over 5 years is better than : 58.16 vs. FCGTX (42.97).
| FCGTX | TLZIX | FCGTX / TLZIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.10 | 360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.17 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.489 | -0.239 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.6B | 9.62B | 453% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 2.30 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.87 | 9.07 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.61 | 25.63 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.97 | 58.16 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.79 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...