Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCGTX vs TLZIX
FCGTX vs TLZIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCGTX vs. TLZIX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCGTX is a Hold and TLZIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCGTX has more cash in the bank: 47.7B vs. TLZIX (10.7B). TLZIX pays higher dividends than FCGTX: TLZIX (2.10) vs FCGTX (1.43). FCGTX was incepted earlier than TLZIX: FCGTX (9 years) vs TLZIX (16 years). FCGTX (0.36) is less costly to investors than TLZIX (0.17). TLZIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. FCGTX (6.00). FCGTX (1000000) and TLZIX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TLZIX (12.90) and FCGTX (12.78) have marching annual gain over last year. TLZIX return over 5 years is better than : 56.28 vs. FCGTX (41.77).
| FCGTX | TLZIX | FCGTX / TLZIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.10 | 360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.17 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.117 | 8.880 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.7B | 10.7B | 446% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 2.10 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.78 | 12.90 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.89 | 38.99 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.77 | 56.28 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 114.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers