Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHTX vs NSFJX
FCHTX vs NSFJX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHTX vs. NSFJX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHTX is a Hold and NSFJX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHTX has more cash in the bank: 40.3B vs. NSFJX (23.1M). NSFJX pays higher dividends than FCHTX: NSFJX (1.47) vs FCHTX (1.39). FCHTX was incepted earlier than NSFJX: FCHTX (8 years) vs NSFJX (8 years). NSFJX (1.63) is less costly to investors than FCHTX (0.37). NSFJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FCHTX (5.00). FCHTX (1000000) and NSFJX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.25 vs. NSFJX (4.07). FCHTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.83 vs. NSFJX (25.25).
| FCHTX | NSFJX | FCHTX / NSFJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.54 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.63 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.018 | 2.128 | 330% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.3B | 23.1M | 174,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.47 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.25 | 4.07 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.59 | 21.68 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.83 | 25.25 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement