Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHTX vs NSFJX
FCHTX vs NSFJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCHTX vs. NSFJX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCHTX is a Hold and NSFJX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHTX has more cash in the bank: 42B vs. NSFJX (12.7M). NSFJX pays higher dividends than FCHTX: NSFJX (1.42) vs FCHTX (1.33). FCHTX was incepted earlier than NSFJX: FCHTX (8 years) vs NSFJX (8 years). NSFJX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FCHTX (0.37). NSFJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FCHTX (5.00). FCHTX (1000000) and NSFJX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FCHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.80 vs. NSFJX (4.46). FCHTX return over 5 years is better than : 45.70 vs. NSFJX (28.46).
| FCHTX | NSFJX | FCHTX / NSFJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.48 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.27 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.617 | 5.412 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42B | 12.7M | 330,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.42 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.80 | 4.46 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.50 | 35.85 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.70 | 28.46 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement