FCIC
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
IHAI
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

FCIC vs IHAI

Header iconFCIC vs IHAI Comparison
Open Charts FCIC vs IHAIBanner chart's image
FCCC
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Innovative Holdings Alliance
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$61.3K
CapitalizationN/A
FCIC vs IHAI Comparison Chart
Loading...
FCIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHAI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCIC vs. IHAI commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIC is a Buy and IHAI is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FCIC: $0.15 vs. IHAI: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FCIC and IHAI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCIC: 84% vs. IHAI: 99%
Market capitalization -- FCIC: $1.83M vs. IHAI: $0
FCIC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $1.83M. IHAI’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIHAI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FCIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IHAI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IHAI is a better buy in the long-term than FCIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCIC’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IHAI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCIC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • IHAI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCIC is a better buy in the short-term than IHAI.

Price Growth

FCIC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IHAI (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -24.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.78% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCIC YTD gains are higher at: -52.381 vs. IHAI (-81.818).
FCICIHAIFCIC / IHAI
Capitalization1.83MN/A-
EBITDA-81KN/A-
Gain YTD-52.381-81.81864%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash150KN/A-
Total Debt200KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCIC vs IHAI: Fundamental Ratings
FCIC
IHAI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3181
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9338
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IHAI's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FCIC (12). This means that IHAI’s stock grew similarly to FCIC’s over the last 12 months.

IHAI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FCIC (100). This means that IHAI’s stock grew similarly to FCIC’s over the last 12 months.

IHAI's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FCIC (100). This means that IHAI’s stock grew similarly to FCIC’s over the last 12 months.

IHAI's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCIC (93). This means that IHAI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCIC’s over the last 12 months.

IHAI's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FCIC (100). This means that IHAI’s stock grew similarly to FCIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCICIHAI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FCIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHAI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PQNAX26.78N/A
N/A
Virtus NFJ Mid-Cap Value A
RLSFX14.36-0.02
-0.14%
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
DIFIX12.24-0.02
-0.16%
MFS Diversified Income I
HGIIX54.57-0.26
-0.47%
Hartford Core Equity I
TLGAX13.28-0.11
-0.82%
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Growth A

FCIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCIC has been loosely correlated with SVIIU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCIC jumps, then SVIIU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCIC
1D Price
Change %
FCIC100%
N/A
SVIIU - FCIC
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CDBT - FCIC
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRGCF - FCIC
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHAI - FCIC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLH - FCIC
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.07%
More

IHAI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IHAI and BLYQ have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IHAI and BLYQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHAI
1D Price
Change %
IHAI100%
N/A
BLYQ - IHAI
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMJU - IHAI
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETER - IHAI
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ILXP - IHAI
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCIC - IHAI
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More