Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCIHX vs REEBX
FCIHX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts FCIHX vs REEBX
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl P
Price$17.56
Change+$0.08 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets871.2M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$59.63
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.45B
FCIHX vs REEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIHX vs. REEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIHX is a StrongBuy and REEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FCIHX (871M). REEBX (0.66) and FCIHX (0.66) have matching dividends . FCIHX was incepted earlier than REEBX: FCIHX (2 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FCIHX (0.89). REEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIHX (12.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIHX: REEBX (250) vs FCIHX (5000000). REEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.32 vs. FCIHX (1.71).
| FCIHX | REEBX | FCIHX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.27 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.27 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.261 | 13.043 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 871M | 133B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.66 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.71 | 2.32 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 15.70 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.42 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.40 | 23.16 | 338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement