Ad is loading...
FCIWX vs REREX
FCIWX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts FCIWX vs REREX
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$15.76
Change+$0.71 (+4.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets747.66M
American Funds Europacific Growth R4
Price$50.39
Change+$2.40 (+5.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.84B
FCIWX vs REREX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCIWX vs. REREX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCIWX is a Buy and REREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FCIWX (748M). REREX pays higher dividends than FCIWX: REREX (1.15) vs FCIWX (0.68). FCIWX was incepted earlier than REREX: FCIWX (8 years) vs REREX (23 years). FCIWX (0.89) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). REREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIWX (12.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than REREX: FCIWX (0) vs REREX (250). FCIWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.86 vs. REREX (-15.26). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 50.74 vs. REREX (13.65).
| FCIWX | REREX | FCIWX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.82 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.82 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.612 | -8.258 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 748M | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.86 | -15.26 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.94 | -9.67 | -41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.74 | 13.65 | 372% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -0.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers