Ad is loading...
FCJTX vs RBEMX
FCJTX vs RBEMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCJTX vs. RBEMX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCJTX is a Hold and RBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCJTX (24.1B) and RBEMX (24.1B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCJTX pays higher dividends than RBEMX: FCJTX (1.25) vs RBEMX (0.50). FCJTX was incepted earlier than RBEMX: FCJTX (8 years) vs RBEMX (11 years). RBEMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FCJTX (0.39). FCJTX (5.00) and RBEMX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCJTX: RBEMX (250) vs FCJTX (1000000). FCJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. RBEMX (5.71). FCJTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.90 vs. RBEMX (43.58).
| FCJTX | RBEMX | FCJTX / RBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.19 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.19 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.681 | -1.916 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 24.1B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.50 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.59 | 5.71 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.02 | 15.92 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.90 | 43.58 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers