Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCJTX vs RBEMX
FCJTX vs RBEMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCJTX vs. RBEMX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCJTX is a Hold and RBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCJTX (26.2B) and RBEMX (26.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCJTX pays higher dividends than RBEMX: FCJTX (1.17) vs RBEMX (0.47). FCJTX was incepted earlier than RBEMX: FCJTX (8 years) vs RBEMX (11 years). RBEMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FCJTX (0.39). FCJTX (5.00) and RBEMX (5.00) have comparable annual turnover. RBEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCJTX: RBEMX (250) vs FCJTX (1000000). FCJTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. RBEMX (9.14). FCJTX return over 5 years is better than : 48.54 vs. RBEMX (44.21).
| FCJTX | RBEMX | FCJTX / RBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.19 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.19 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.837 | 6.453 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.2B | 26.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 0.47 | 250% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | 9.14 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.47 | 37.95 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.54 | 44.21 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers