Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCJTX vs TRRNX
FCJTX vs TRRNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCJTX vs. TRRNX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCJTX is a Hold and TRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCJTX has more cash in the bank: 25.5B vs. TRRNX (10.6B). TRRNX (1.29) and FCJTX (1.23) have matching dividends . FCJTX was incepted earlier than TRRNX: FCJTX (8 years) vs TRRNX (18 years). TRRNX (0.64) is less costly to investors than FCJTX (0.39). TRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.60 vs. FCJTX (5.00). TRRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCJTX: TRRNX (2500) vs FCJTX (1000000). FCJTX (8.40) and TRRNX (8.08) have marching annual gain over last year. TRRNX (50.34) and FCJTX (49.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FCJTX | TRRNX | FCJTX / TRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.64 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.64 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.591 | 3.318 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.5B | 10.6B | 241% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.29 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.40 | 8.08 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.25 | 27.90 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.07 | 50.34 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers